Home

Previous Entry | Next Entry

Stoking Rage

  • Nov. 21st, 2007 at 12:32 AM
orc, Lurtz, D&D, fantasy, furious
[info]lithera posted this update from CNN about the Saudi rape case.

I've seen comments around the web from people arguing that the rule of law is the rule of law, and that while we may not like how Saudi Arabia does business, its their country and they've got a right to do as they please.

Bullshit.

She was raped. And she's being punished for it. She is being flogged 200 times because she had the audacity to go out without a male relative accompanying her. And that's the excuse for it, because that's her wearing a short skirt, innit? She was asking for it, right?

Except, this little thing, this tiny little thing, that says that a human being shouldn't have to move in fear in the world. That a society that equates and unescorted woman with a viable target is a broken one (and yes, I'm aware I'm talking about more than Saudi Arabia, here).

I will say it again. She was raped. Specifically, she was gang-raped by 7 men. And she's going to spend 6 months in a Saudi prison (and anyone who can weigh in on what that stay is going to be like, I'm sure we'd all love to hear it.) She's going to be flogged 200 times, and then she's going to prison for months.

And saying they -- meaning the Saudi Government -- has the right to do as they please is the same as saying that what's happening in Darfur is cool, because, y'know, that's their thing, we don't have anything to do with it.

Basic.
Human.
Rights.

Universal rights. Inherent rights.

But Saudi Arabia has never really been big on those. Not when a society is built upon a caste-system of dehumanization and hatred. No, Saudi Arabia has never been big on those basic human rights.

And to all you NeoCons out there -- nice fucking job, assholes. You sure as hell have done a bang-up job showing Saudi the way towards Democratic Enlightenment. You dumbfucks.

The fact that, time and again, the Saudi government is excused for its reprehensible, vile, horrific behavior, makes me want to projectile vomit. Our government's continued kowtowing to their regime is shameful.

Some things need to be indefensible, must remain inexcusable.

Comments

[info]amazonx wrote:
Nov. 21st, 2007 01:10 pm (UTC)
Just to clarify one thing
I totally agree with everything you said, not arguing. She's getting the sentence to talking to the media, not going out alone. Do I think she should be punished? Hell no! But we have those same twisted laws here in the US, where anyone talking about a case can be jailed, if there's a gag order. There may be a blanket gag order on all cases in Saudi, who knows. But I think she should be let go free.

Does anyone know about the search/capture/punishment of her attackers? How is that case going?
[info]dewline wrote:
Nov. 21st, 2007 01:37 pm (UTC)
Her attackers?
If I recall the BBC coverage correctly, I think at least five of them got their sentences doubled from five to ten years' jail time.(And apparently CNN's contradicting my memory by saying "from two years to nine".)

Small favour? No favour?

Edited at 2007-11-21 01:38 pm (UTC)
[info]amazonx wrote:
Nov. 21st, 2007 01:57 pm (UTC)
Re: Her attackers?
At least some were captured and sentenced. It would be more insult ontop of injury that they didn't get caught at all.
[info]dewline wrote:
Nov. 21st, 2007 02:05 pm (UTC)
Re: Her attackers?
I suppose so...up to a point.

Dammit.
[info]amazonx wrote:
Nov. 21st, 2007 02:09 pm (UTC)
Re: Her attackers?
At least some were captured and sentenced. It would be more insult ontop of injury that they didn't get caught at all.
[info]dewline wrote:
Nov. 21st, 2007 02:08 pm (UTC)
By the way...
...about that icon?

You may want to rethink that, given some some of the concerns recently voiced by Heather Mallick.

Then again, you may want to accelerate your paperwork if you've already started. I don't know when our next federal election's going to be, after all.

Edited at 2007-11-21 02:08 pm (UTC)
[info]amazonx wrote:
Nov. 21st, 2007 02:17 pm (UTC)
Re: By the way...
It's a joke amongst my friends, actually.

Them: What do you want to be when you grow up?
Me: Canadian?
[info]ruckawriter wrote:
Nov. 21st, 2007 03:50 pm (UTC)
Re: Just to clarify one thing
Sentences were increased/doubled. Maximum time served for those involved is now 9 years; minimum is 2.

Make of that what you will.

Latest Month

September 2009
S M T W T F S
  12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930   

Tags

Powered by LiveJournal.com
Designed by Paulina Bozek