One of my many dirty little secrets is that I'm a very intolerant reader. I detest bad writing, and since "bad writing" is subjective, I find myself filled with a lot of detest a lot of the time. Most of what I pick up I end up putting down, sometimes violently, sometimes by hurling it across the room. Shortly after signing my first book deal, my editor, Kate Miciak, sent me a list of books she suggested I read. I distinctly remember tearing one of them in two and flinging the sections in opposite directions - something that, as an author, I am not proud of, because I know how much effort goes into writing a novel, and I am willing to entertain that - subjectively - that effort is still tremendous, even if the product offends me to my core.
Over the last several years, in fact, I've been reading less and less fiction, and more and more nonfiction. For obvious reasons, I find it easier to suspend my judgment when reading nonfiction.
I am not proud of this, actually. To write, one must read, and that means reading fiction. It is, in fact, a shortcoming I am actively seeking to address, and if there is a resolution for this new year, it's that: I may not become a more tolerant reader, but I will read more.
As an aside, I have a suspicion that I'm not the only writer who suffers from this. We're a terribly judgmental lot about our work. I just have a chronic problem in not knowing when to shut the hell up about it.
Paradoxically, I have become something of a connoisseur of children's literature. This happens when you have two childrens, and you read to them regularly. This is why I am such a tremendous fan of Mo Willems. Aside from his tremendous talent as an artist and storyteller, he consistently delivers books that never condescend to children. I'm also a fan of his somewhat subversive stealth campaign -- his books rely as much, if not more, on visual storytelling (comics) as on the root text.
Still, most children's books suck, and there's no getting around it.
Which brings me to Katherine Paterson's The Great Gilly Hopkins, which most certainly does not suck. I'd not read her stuff before. I managed to miss The Bridge to Teribithia in all of its incarnations. She was unknown to me. I purchased the book based on a chapter of it I had read in an anthology of "Stories for Girls" that my daughter received over the holidays. My daughter fell asleep -- and being four, I don't blame her -- but I was engaged enough to seek the novel out.
Outstanding. Not a whiff of condescension to be found within. Beautifully written, and Paterson's control of voice is enviable -- she flies effortlessly between limited third and first within the space of paragraphs, and it works flawlessly.
Four's young for the book, too young, as it requires a better grasp of the world and a more evolved sense of empathy, but my soon-to-be-eight-year-old is just right for it, and I'm putting it in his hands when he gets home from school.
Over the last several years, in fact, I've been reading less and less fiction, and more and more nonfiction. For obvious reasons, I find it easier to suspend my judgment when reading nonfiction.
I am not proud of this, actually. To write, one must read, and that means reading fiction. It is, in fact, a shortcoming I am actively seeking to address, and if there is a resolution for this new year, it's that: I may not become a more tolerant reader, but I will read more.
As an aside, I have a suspicion that I'm not the only writer who suffers from this. We're a terribly judgmental lot about our work. I just have a chronic problem in not knowing when to shut the hell up about it.
Paradoxically, I have become something of a connoisseur of children's literature. This happens when you have two childrens, and you read to them regularly. This is why I am such a tremendous fan of Mo Willems. Aside from his tremendous talent as an artist and storyteller, he consistently delivers books that never condescend to children. I'm also a fan of his somewhat subversive stealth campaign -- his books rely as much, if not more, on visual storytelling (comics) as on the root text.
Still, most children's books suck, and there's no getting around it.
Which brings me to Katherine Paterson's The Great Gilly Hopkins, which most certainly does not suck. I'd not read her stuff before. I managed to miss The Bridge to Teribithia in all of its incarnations. She was unknown to me. I purchased the book based on a chapter of it I had read in an anthology of "Stories for Girls" that my daughter received over the holidays. My daughter fell asleep -- and being four, I don't blame her -- but I was engaged enough to seek the novel out.
Outstanding. Not a whiff of condescension to be found within. Beautifully written, and Paterson's control of voice is enviable -- she flies effortlessly between limited third and first within the space of paragraphs, and it works flawlessly.
Four's young for the book, too young, as it requires a better grasp of the world and a more evolved sense of empathy, but my soon-to-be-eight-year-old is just right for it, and I'm putting it in his hands when he gets home from school.
- Mood:inspired
- Music:On The Radio // Begin To Hope by Regina Spektor


Comments
But even though I'm picky, I've yet to be violent to a work of fiction.
Wait, I take that back - I did just burn One More Day.
But apart from that, nope.
Edited at 2008-01-08 08:46 pm (UTC)
I had a similar reaction to the final issue of Wanted.
K-nuffle!
Nuffle!!
"Some philosopher — I don’t remember who — his theory was: You’ve got to give kids really beautiful children’s books in order to turn them into revolutionaries. Because if they see these beautiful things when they’re young, when they grow up, they’ll see the real world and say, 'Why is the world so ugly?! I remember when the world was beautiful.' And then they’ll fight, and they’ll have a revolution. They’ll fight against all of our corruption in the world, they’ll fight to try to make the world more beautiful. That’s the job of a good children’s-book illustrator."
Or a children's book writer, I think - all the more reason to be intolerant of the garbage.
Apropos to nothing, my favorite Katherine Patterson book remains Park's Quest.
That being said, if you're interested in more YA stuff, I'm sure I could dig up my old reading lists for you. (My library coworkers and I would have Caldecott, Newbery, and Rebecca Caudill pre-award reading lists so that we could be informed when the nominations were released.)
Because hey. Literacy is my crack and I will push it like the gleeful drug what it is.
I read Bridge to Terebithia when I was in first or second grade during the 15 minute silent reading break after lunch, and without spoiling anything, I remember having to be consoled by the teacher cause it's so sad. I still haven't seen the movie because I'm too much of a wuss.
One of the ones that stays with me always is Margaret Wise Brown's Wait Till the Moon is Full. I still can't read it now without tearing up - I used to have my mom read it to me over and over again when I was three and four years old. It has a purity and beauty that I find lacking in most other children's literature.
It also forever cemented my adoration of raccoons. Highly recommended - I bet both you and your daughter would love it, if you haven't read it!
Above shout-out to Plain Janes seconded.
(edited for *points at your icon* TOTH!)
Edited at 2008-01-09 12:31 am (UTC)
I have no idea what you are talking about.
...what?
;)
-E
Greg -
My wife -- a serious children's lit fan -- says that you should get everything by Robin McKinley, for both your son _and_ daughter. Start with The Hero and the Crown, then The Blue Sword, and go from there. (She reads all of them at least once a year, whenever she feels "not so powerful".)
She says that you would like them, as well, given the strong female leads.
Outlaws of Sherwood is my favorite retelling of Robin Hood, and Beauty is my favorite of Beauty and the Beast. Bar none for both.
Although Deerskin is a much harsher subject than her usual (and really isn't YA, as a warning), it is another of my favorites, and not just because Mckinley can write dogs (and horses) so darned well.
Apparently when I was sent to my room with temper tantrums, they got a kick out of listening to the tantrum suddenly off, because they knew I had found a book.
My sister said my mother walked around glowing for weeks after I said that.
Just so you know. :D
Not to say I can't be critical, but I have a wide tolerance. Possibly why I am so bad at trying to write remotely fictional things, although I spend all day writing official correspondence, official memos, etc.
That said, let me add my voice to the praisers of Katherine Paterson. She wrote three small books set in Japan at various times, pitched for children. All excellent. Also, she wrote an interesting historical fiction novel about the Taiping rebellion in China, also very good.
I have plenty to recommend from my shelves, but, given my broader tolerance level, I refrain from bombarding you with recommendations that might leave you less than pleased.
To which, I think, I said, "Well, yeah. If it's, y'know, GOOD."
I have not, I'm afraid, mellowed very much. Though I am still willing to grant dispensation to certain stories.
I don't seem to have this problem. I try to read a lot, and I've never wanted to destroy a book. It probably helps that I try to only read things I know I'll be interested in. I'm on a big cyberpunk kick right now (not coincidentally, that's what I'm currently writing) peppered with some Hammett and Chandler for good measure.
My biggest problem really comes in just not having enough time to read everything I want to. My bookshelf is piled high with books I've been meaning to read for years.
You might just have to find what you like and then stick with that, and avoid everything else until you run out of what you like (which may be fairly quick, depending on how focused your like is).
I don't know children's lit from Adam, but my fiancée is a connoisseur. Every time we hit London, she ends up spending ridiculous amounts of money on first editions and out of print stuff. I'll ask her for some recommendations when she gets back from work.
Don't sweat ripping one in half. I wouldn't eat a bad apple just because it took a farmer a year to grow it...
Finally read the Pullman's "His Dark Materials" saga this summer--not sure why that's considered a kids book...any book that has Angels fighting God is probably a bit deep for kids...reading Forrester's Horatio Hornblower novels now and really relating believe it or not
I have to say, I found the ending of Gilly... very much unexpected, perfectly appropriate, and very sophisticated.
Which, I think, says a lot more about my assumptions of what children "get" and "don't get" than it does about the book itself. And I'm the guy who is always saying, "the reader is smarter than you."
Good to remember that applies to all readers.
and alexg119, you should read Kai Meyer's stuff if you think angels fighting God is too deep for kids...whew! Pullman has nothing on that guy.
JP
And I agree with alryssa below about Charles de Lint, I WANT to like de Lint, I admire the work he's done and I love the whole notion of 'real world' meets fantasy, but yeah, he's prose is laborious for some reason.
Personally, I never got past the first ten pages of Marion Zimmer Bradley's Mists of Avalon, even though people rave about it - because I couldn't stomach the hybridisation of Welsh/English placenames and terms that were completely inexplicable to me (being Welsh, it greatly offended my sensibilities - historically we've been, even up until the 1950's, extremely subverted by English attitudes). It's a culture thing. So I tossed the book across the room in rage and never thought about trying to read it again.
Charles de Lint is... well, everyone seems to think he's awesome too, but frankly I found his prose somewhat clunky and awkward. I read at least four of his novels, thinking it might just be a one-off thing, but while the concepts seem sound and interesting, they don't seem to quite come off.
I've found a recent fantasy author I enjoy, though - Jennifer Fallon. Her Second Sons trilogy was deliciously complex with its political maneuvering, and unlike a lot of pitfalls of fantasy, she doesn't get bogged down with explaining the world. She just gets right on with the characters, and they're all extremely three-dimensional with their own agendas. Highly enjoyable, even if you're not into fantasy at all.
As far as children's literature, I've been meaning to get my hands on a copy of a book I read in high school, and though it was aimed at children much younger, I still recall feeling awed by its story and premise, and I think an eight year old would likely enjoy it: Spellhorn by Berlie Doherty. The main character is blind. The author worked specifically with a group of blind children to help create the story, and it was just so different in its approach. Granted, it's been a very long time since I read it, so I don't know if it'd stand up to my adult scrutiny.
Eragon was just plain awful. I couldn't go more than a few sentences without thinking, "Well, this was clearly ripped out of X, and this comes shamelessly from Y."
That's all I'm saying.
And since I've had children, I've fallen headlong in love with Mo Willems from day one--his "Sheep in the Big City" was a habit even before children, and while not on DVD, it is on iTunes. (My 3 yr old son's most favorite thing in the world right now is his very own Knuffle Bunny.) We also love Adam Rex, both his picture books and his new novel; again, his work relies as much on the visual at times. And Lauren Child is a favorite of both my 3 yr old and my 6 yr old.
I'm very fond of her version of "The Princess and the Pea", as well.
Beverly Cleary was one of my favorites, at about the age yours are at, on into grade-school-ish. There was always something in her writing that could strike a chord in me, especially in the "Ramona" series. But then, I was the youngest, with sisters, and the creative one in the family, as was Ramona. She wrote childhood frustration and angst very well.